« PICTURE IT. IT'S 1973. YOU ARE A HOUSEWIFE. -- UPDATED | Main | SYMBOLIC FEMINIST GESTURE "MOVES OUR CULTURE CLOSER TO THE PRECIPICE" »

Comments

NotJstPink

See, having sex during periods is a matter of personal choice... only downside might be (if any) the mess it creates..

http://notjstpink.com/tag/tips-on-having-sex-in-periods/

Leah

Zan,

So sorry for such a late post. I "accidently" found this site doing a google search.

After reading some of your comments, particularly about "Al Martin," my blood began to boil and I just had to respond. Sad to say, Al Martin is not the man you think he is. I speak from sad experience. He is probably one of the biggest destroyers of the marriage institution!

And his false teachings are being spread world-wide as other men are all too eager to adopt his practices. What am I talking about???

Just a small snipet, with quotes from Al Martin himself, please go read the article: "A Word To The Wives" @
www.wickedshepherds.com/awordtothewives.html

There are many articles at this site exposing the false teaching of "eldership rule" and how it is destroying the marriage institution.

Leah

fsdf

中国公文网 中国皮肤网 中国呼吸网fdsfsdf

In this economy, it's a practical matter - stay together because 2 can live cheaper than 1.

rate my body

i would have beaten him. this is not right.

rate my body

this is such a great read. thanks for sharing this.

the king

ok as a guy i find this this disturbing. that means i can have sex with my wife any type i want no matter what? is this guy married (if this speaker is a girl i bet she gets weird guys asking for marriage all the time....unless she ugly)
if this was true that means women would lose rights and men freaking come from women so that means our creator's are losing there rights from there creations (or there strange fellow creators) weird....

extrait de marron d inde

Schlafly ridiculously criticizes feminism, when her activism and career are owed entirely to the work of feminists. Had it not been for the suffragists, as well as the feminists who argued to allow women into the workforce and the realm of political discourse, Schlafly would have had no career whatsoever. That Schlafly criticizes feminism is hypocritical and a betrayal of those who worked to allow her to have a role in the public realm.

aa batterien

Schlafly ridiculously criticizes feminism, when her activism and career are owed entirely to the work of feminists. Had it not been for the suffragists, as well as the feminists who argued to allow women into the workforce and the realm of political discourse, Schlafly would have had no career whatsoever. That Schlafly criticizes feminism is hypocritical and a betrayal of those who worked to allow her to have a role in the public realm.

r4ds

The only time I think it would be wrong for a woman to say no is if she is being manipulative or withholding purposely for long periods of time. I think this would indicate some sort of emotional issues or even physical issues. I think it's true of any marriage Christian or not that some times the husbands and wives are out of sync and when both partners are loving their spouses there has to be some give and take. Christian marriages when they are truly Biblical are actually more egalitarian than most non Christians recognize.

The comments to this entry are closed.