I went a little overboard on the women in law partnerships article in the New York Times, mainly because it is a subject of great and immediate interest to me.
For some pithier takes on the issue, read the posts by Jeremy Blachman and Opinionistas.
« THE NEW YORK TIMES ASKS WHY SO FEW WOMEN REACH THE TOP OF BIG LAW FIRMS, PART 3 OF 3: BILLABLE HOURS | Main | CARNIVAL OF FEMINISTS AND OTHER FEMINIST BLOGGING »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451f6e769e200d8347d49c053ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference PITHY WRITING ON OTHER BLOGS ABOUT WOMEN IN LAW PARTNERSHIPS:
The comments to this entry are closed.
It's your blog, you can spend all the time you want to on billable hours! I'm not in law, but I'm interested in this, too. While working for a state department of transportation I had to keep track of billable hours and there was a lot of pressure to bill even routine office tasks to projects in some way. The more honest of us had a problem with that.
Thanks for the glimpse into the legal profession.
Posted by: Juti | March 23, 2006 at 12:54 PM